This should in fact not an issue with this construction; Sir John de- Keith d

This should in fact not an issue with this construction; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn wife out-of Malise

Concerning the Comyn daughter who had been wife off Malise out of Strathearn, I got theorized when you look at the 2005 you to definitely she had been Margaret, defined as spouse out-of Sir John de- Keith (find duplicate out of article lower than) who was 2ndly age are offered for the reason that post: the latest partner Emma I would suggest is actually of some other family unit members, and not mommy of your own 2nd Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan_ , states partly, ‘Malise, Earl off Strathearn, had a wife Emma, inside 1261-1267, whose surname is not familiar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. from Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. a little while before 1270, to make certain that their widow (Margaret) would-have-been “available” a bit after Emma.

It was of course a speculation; it does have the benefit of working with a known relationships ranging from Muriel Keith and Reginald le Cheyne. Anymore associated documents would obviously feel welcome.

The latest membership for the Scots Peerage in regards to the category of Keith says of Sir John de- Keith (d. ca. 1270) he was thought to has married Comyn, earl from Buchan . So it character, of one’s unsure (“thought to was in fact”) diversity, are now able to become corrected according to research by the after the dispensation, old in the Fondi to your fourteen The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 On bishop out of Moray. Professors so you’re able to distribute Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you may Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, of Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, on impediment in order to matrimony due to the third and you will fourth amounts of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step one. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the near future second partner out of Robert Stewart, first Duke from Albany (d. 1420), are developed so you’re able to wed Reginald ce Cheyne, young man of Sir Reginald ce Cheyne because of the his partner (since their earliest husband), Helen from Strathearn. While you are you will find popular gaps throughout the origins out of Muriel Keith, she and you will Reginald le Cheyne do share a descent regarding Comyns. Yet not, this is certainly as well faraway to require a beneficial dispensation when the Muriel try a-great-high grandd Comyn, Earl away from Buchan (d. 1233), which may end up being the situation if the is why child.

dos. Reginald ce Cheyne was a beneficial-grandson out-of Marjory Comyn, daughter from Alexander Comyn, Earl from Buchan (d. 1290), young buck regarding William Comyn in the list above. Their own son try Malise, Earl out of Strathearn from 1312 so you can their dying into the 1328 , and you may pops off Reginald.

ca. 1270), are identical to Marjory Comyn, and you can hitched 2ndly to help you Malise, Earl from Strathearn (d. 1312). This should indicate the fresh parentage a€?thought to has actually been’ that of Margaret, spouse off Sir John de Keith, try of one age bracket: she would not have been the d Comyn, Earl off Buchan, but instead out-of their child Alexander. There is absolutely no evidence https://kissbrides.com/american-women/ that Earl Malise and you may Marjory Comyn had been married far in advance of 1275: once the Lindsay had written,

Discover you to discernable basis about what the relationship ranging from Reginald ce Cheyne and Muriel Keith will have existed: if the Margaret Comyn, spouse from Sir John de Keith (d

‘ The fresh partner in the earl, on 1275, is entitled Marjory, once we see the attesting condition away from No. curriculum vitae., in fact it is stated by the Wyntoun, Book VIII. man. vi., having become the second sister out of John Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan, exactly who discussed on the behalf of Earl Malise the wedding settlement significantly more than said [old at London area, April twenty six, 1293 for their daughter Matilda and you may Robert de Tony, young buck from Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = Age de- Quincy E of Buchan I __________________I________________ I III step 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith We (als I E of Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We We We I I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de Keith Elizabeth away from = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony I ______I_______________________ We I I We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de Age out of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 I ce Cheyne We I We = 2) Sir David We V We We de- Graham Sir William de- We I__________ Keith We I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We We I III We We I I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke regarding Albany)

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد.

شما میتوانید از برچسب ها و ویژگی های HTML هم استفاده کنید: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*

code

بالا